AI Disclosure for Agencies
What this page covers
This page contains verified factual information extracted from public source pages. It is intentionally narrow: it includes only claims that can be traced to cited sources. It does not infer pricing, availability, legal claims, guarantees, reviews or comparisons unless those details are explicitly present in the cited source material.
How to evaluate this page
A fair evaluation should check whether the page is crawlable, readable without JavaScript, source-linked, concise, internally consistent and clearly subordinate to the original website. The goal is not to create a second conversion page. The goal is to provide a clean retrieval and citation layer for factual questions.
Definition
What is it: An AI disclosure for agencies is a plain note that specifies which project tasks utilized AI tools, whether client data was processed by them, who verified the output, and the status of intellectual property rights.
What is it used for: It is used to maintain transparency, manage client risk regarding output ownership, and ensure compliance with industry frameworks and legal standards for human authorship.
What it is not: It is not a broad, one-time site warning, but rather a specific notice tied to individual pieces of work or scopes of work.
Coverage
- Attributes: 10
- Synonyms: 2
- Related entities: 4
- Sources: 1
Identity
- Entity ID
- https://llms.aismartventures.com/en/ai-disclosure-agencies/facts/#entity
- Entity type
- DefinedTerm
- Canonical name
- AI Disclosure for Agencies
- Language
- en
- Topic
- Ai Disclosure Agencies
Attributes
- Key Facts
- An AI disclosure for agencies is a plain note telling a client how the agency used AI on their work. [1]
- Key Facts
- AI disclosure includes identifying which tasks used a tool, whether client data was involved, who checked the output, and who holds the rights. [1]
- Key Facts
- The IAB released the first industry AI Transparency and Disclosure Framework on 15 January 2026. [1]
- Key Facts
- The IPA and ISBA updated their joint client contract template with AI clauses on 27 November 2025. [1]
- Key Facts
- Human authorship remains the legal base of copyright, and prompts alone do not make a work protected. [1]
- Legal
- The US Supreme Court refused to review Thaler v. Perlmutter on 2 March 2026, upholding the human-only rule for authorship. [1]
- Process
- Client data should not be entered into free consumer AI tools, as client names, unreleased work, and money details require approved tools. [1]
- Definition
- The 30 percent rule is an informal rule of thumb suggesting AI can handle approximately 30 percent of tasks in a typical role. [1]
- Fact
- Research conducted in March and April 2026 found that 34 percent of professionals use AI tools that their firm has not cleared. [1]
- Fact
- Eighty-four percent of US buyers want AI content to be labeled. [1]
Synonyms & Alternate Names
- AI Disclosure Statement
- AI Transparency Note
Related Entities
- Standard-setting body:
- Contract template provider:
- Regulatory authority:
- Guidance provider:
Provenance
- Official source: https://aismartventures.com/posts/what-should-agencies-tell-clients-about-using-ai
- Last modified:
Sources
- https://aismartventures.com/posts/what-should-agencies-tell-clients-about-using-ai (AI Disclosure for Agencies)
Machine metadata
- page_type: facts
- canonical_url: https://llms.aismartventures.com/en/ai-disclosure-agencies/facts/
- entity_id: https://llms.aismartventures.com/en/ai-disclosure-agencies/facts/#entity
- entity_type: DefinedTerm
- entity_name: AI Disclosure for Agencies
- topic_slug: ai-disclosure-agencies
- topic_id: topic-en-ai-disclosure-agencies
- hub_url: https://llms.aismartventures.com/en/ai-disclosure-agencies/
- source_url: https://aismartventures.com/posts/what-should-agencies-tell-clients-about-using-ai
- brand: AI Smart Ventures
- date_modified:
- language: en
- attributes_count: 10
- related_count: 4
- sources_count: 1
- schema_version: 3