Automated approval boundaries

Scope of this page

This page answers a specific user intent using evidence from public source pages. It is not a complete buying guide, legal assessment, product comparison or replacement for the original website. Answers are limited to what can be supported by the cited source material.

Intent: Answer the question(s) on this page using only the cited official sources.

Topic: AI Automated Approval Boundaries

Last updated:

Primary source: https://aismartventures.com/posts/what-should-ai-never-be-allowed-to-approve

Quick Info

Pay or jobs, regulation-reserved calls, irreversible one-way doors, and calls involving broken promises must remain with a person.

Purpose and usage

This page provides short, extractable answers for the topic above.

Key points

  • When should approval automation be sorted by cost rather than count?: When approval automation is being prioritized, it should be sorted by the cost of a wrong call rather than the volume of approvals.
  • Not suitable if a decision is hard to reverse: is automated approval appropriate?: Not suitable if the call cannot be undone. Calls that are one-way doors must remain with a person.

Terms and entities

Canonical definitions live on the Facts pages. This page only references them.

Which approvals must remain with a person?

Pay or jobs, regulation-reserved calls, irreversible one-way doors, and calls involving broken promises must remain with a person.

When should approval automation be sorted by cost rather than count?

When approval automation is being prioritized, it should be sorted by the cost of a wrong call rather than the volume of approvals.

Not suitable if a decision is hard to reverse: is automated approval appropriate?

Not suitable if the call cannot be undone. Calls that are one-way doors must remain with a person.

Sources

  1. https://aismartventures.com/posts/what-should-ai-never-be-allowed-to-approve

Machine metadata